December 8, 2008
-
BigotedCS
I warn you, this is an angry, possibly offensive rant… Those with weak hearts or stomachs should look away now…
The BCS is BS, and we all know it. In fact, all three letters are wrong. B=bowl, and since the precious matchups are not preserved for all bowls as they were, the ‘bowls’ are not the bowls they once were; C=championship, and last time I checked, most ‘championships’ are not split and everyone has a chance to win it; and S=series, since only one game matters every year, and the rest are semi-pointless exhibitions. But there is actually something worse about it… the BCS is actually bigoted. Racist (or it’s equivalent). Now, I am not trying to say a game of football is as bad or important to the oppression of Jim Crow and Apartheid, but it’s the same idea: The good ol’ boys keeping the club, the rich getting richer, separate but equal. Here is my beef.
Boise State was snubbed, and the BCS game was given to a very undeserving Ohio State team (sorry Steph). Why?
It’s not the rankings.
AP Top 25- 1.Florida (50)
- 2.Oklahoma (9)
- 3.Texas (6)
- 4.Alabama
- 5.USC
- 6.Penn St.
- 7.Utah
- 8.Texas Tech
- 9.Boise St.
- 10.Ohio St.
USA Today- 1.Oklahoma (31)
- 2.Florida (26)
- 3.Texas (4)
- 4.Alabama
- 5.USC
- 6.Penn St.
- 7.Utah
- 8.Texas Tech
- 9.Boise St.
- 10.Ohio St.
BCS Harris Poll USA Today Computer Rankings TEAM BCS AVG PRVS RK PTS % RK PTS % COMP AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Oklahoma .9757 2 2 2699 .9554 1 1482 .9718 1 25 25 25 25 25 25 1.000 2 Florida .9479 4 1 2776 .9827 2 1481 .9711 3 22 24 23 21 22 22 .890 3 Texas .9298 3 3 2616 .9260 3 1408 .9233 2 23 22 24 23 24 24 .940 4 Alabama .8443 1 4 2442 .8644 T-4 1309 .8584 6 20 21 21 20 20 19 .810 5 USC .8208 5 5 2413 .8542 T-4 1309 .8584 7 17 23 19 19 19 18 .750 6 Utah .7846 6 7 2119 .7501 7 1134 .7436 5 24 19 22 22 21 21 .860 7 Texas Tech .7840 7 8 2090 .7398 8 1132 .7423 4 21 20 20 24 23 23 .870 8 Penn State .7387 8 6 2186 .7738 6 1193 .7823 9 18 16 17 16 16 17 .660 9 Boise State .6980 9 9 1938 .6860 9 1034 .6780 8 19 18 18 18 18 20 .730 10 Ohio State .6354 10 10 1858 .6577 10 1004 .6584 11 16 17 16 12 11 15 .590 Remember, these are the man’s rankings, the man’s system. Boise beat that system, got ranked 9th in all polls, significantly ahead of Ohio State, and they STILL gave it to Ohio State. The only reason, which in theory should have NOTHING to do with the decision, is the almighty dollar. They want to keep the money in the family and/or they think they will sell more tickets with OSU. Oh, but it is about the student athlete, right? Now THAT is BS.
What is the difference in the bowls?
Poinsettia Bowl TCU (MWC) v Boise State December 23 $750,000 Fiesta Bowl Texas (Big 12) v Ohio State January 5 $17 million Yes, that’s a difference of $16.25 Million, or 22x as much money. Remember that the conferences split that money too, and Ohio State was already getting a share of Penn State’s BCS bowl money, so now, the rich Big 12 gets twice the money, and the WAC gets some pocket change. Not only is the BCS designed to not give non-BCS teams a chance, but now they are basically colluding against the mid-majors. If I was Boise State and the WAC, I would sue the BCS for discrimination, with a minimum damage of $16.25 Million. I’m not trying to say Boise deserves to play Florida in the championship game, but you can’t be this obvious in your bigotry.
EDIT: According to Karl Benson, WAC commish (who emailed me back), the difference is more like $4 million, which is still too much money and does not make this any less unfair.
As an aside, I think this conspiracy runs deeper than everyone thinks. After the 2004 Utah win, which was a given, and the unexpected win by Boise in 2005, the BCS has been actively looking to embarrass the mid-Majors. Why else would non-BCS teams play SEC teams that are bad matchups for them in SEC territory. Utah could play well against any of the spread offenses (Oklahoma, Texas, Florida, Texas Tech, ~Ohio State, ~Penn St, Va Tech, Cincinnati, etc.) because of their excellent secondary. Alabama is the WORST matchup for them. I guess I need Tin Foil for my head…
Of course, as I have said before, there is a solution. As promised, here are my seeds, with assistance from the BCS rankings and Fernman.
1. Oklahoma*
2. Florida*
3. Texas
4. Alabama
5. ‘$c*
6. Texas Tech
7. Penn State*
8. Utah*
9. Boise State*
10. TCU
11. Ohio State
12. Cincinnati*
13. Virginia Tech*
14. East Carolina*
15. Buffalo*
16. Troy*
*=automatic bid, won conferenceSo, 16 would play 1 (Troy vs. Oklahoma), 15 vs. 2 (Buffalo vs. Florida), etc. In my plan, the first round would be at home, and the bowl games would take up the remaining games (more details here). And you know what? Florida and Oklahoma might still play each other for the championship in this universe, but that’s not the point. This way, it would be a real championship, because the actual champion could be decided ON THE FIELD and EVERYONE would have a chance. I know, sounds odd… With this system, if they are gonna put BCS teams in automatically, why don’t we just skip the season, and just have ‘$c play Georgia like everyone wanted in August and let the BCS schools just pillage the treasury over and over and over…
Momentum is growing for a real championship, and if you can, do the only thing that can make it happen: stop caring, like me. That means: don’t watch the other BCS games, don’t spend money on the BCS, and complain, complain, complain to everyone you know. In fact, I am going to send part of this to the WAC and Boise, in hopes that a lawsuit might come of it.
I know of at least one person on my side.
P.S. If you look below, you will notice I am reading a book (guess who)! I know, I hate to read, but I think I can get into reading historical nonfiction. My aunt bought it for me, and I felt obligated to read it, but I really like it. This will be my first book for pleasure since Mongolia and that makes only 2.5 in the last decade.


Comments (10)
How can you care that much?
@sheilster -
Well, I love football, and this is just wrong.
Matt, I can honestly say I miss your crazy rants more than anything else. You are so funny.
Matt… you are not crazy. I totally agree with your assessment that the BCS is SUPER unfair to the non-BSC conference schools. I would like to see that changed in the future.
Matt, don’t listen to anyone who thinks this is crazy!!! I love your passion about stuff like this, and if it wasn’t for people like you who care so much, then nothing would ever change, and big conferences would continue to push around small conferences, and justice will never be seen!!!
Loved this entry and sent it to all my friends who love college football!
Liz
@musings2008 -
Any you know who gets screwed too? Utah State! They lost somewhere around $1,000,000 from this bigotry.
Matt, what are you doing for Christmas? Kyle and I are going to celebrate up here with a pot-luck dinner, friends, cheesy christmas sweaters.. the whole shee-bang. I invited Ian cause I know that he isn’t going to AZ or to WY… I would be so happy if you could make it too….
Not sure of the exact date… either the 24, 25, or 26, whenever the most people can make it I suppose…
Let me know if you will be in the field or not. OH! and Ian has your guitar… don’t let him tell you otherwise!
@musings2008 -
Sounds awesome, but I am going back to So Cal for xmas… thanks for the invite!
Right on Brah!
Eff the man!
Wait…Barak’s going to be the man in a few. Can we still say, Eff the man?
OMG… i can’t believe i missed this post! YEAH… BSC is UNFAIR! it’d be interesting to see a playoff game of ohio v. boise state… and boise state has a pretty good fan following… like probably the entire state of idaho! but boise state had said they would be happy to go to wherever…and they weren’t whiny!